Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Movie Review: "Friends With Benefits"
Okay, I lied. This post won't have my Turner Classic Challenge answers in it. I forgot that I meant to write about Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis making me laugh my ass off.
Now, the thing about this movie is that it has the same premise as "No Strings Attached," with Natalie Portman and Ashton Kutcher, where friends agree to have casual sex with each other but not be in a relationship.
Having now seen both (did I post a review of "NSA"? I don't remember) I can say that I definitely liked "FWB" better, and not just because Justin is ever so much hotter than Ashton. I liked it better because it was much, much funnier. "NSA" had all of the cheesy rom-com moments we've come to expect and dislike, and while the formula is basically the same, the delivery in "FWB" makes all the difference.
Justin and Mila banter the way my friends (JUST friends, no benefits) banter -- quick, sarcastic, snarky, ridiculous, random. They also care about each other the way my friends and I care about each other. Of course the inevitable happens and real feelings come into play, and they have to decide what they're going to do about them (here's where it got a bit rom-commy for me).
Just in writing this post, I've figured out the main reason "FWB" appealed to me more than "NSA." The answer is right in the title: Friends. Natalie and Ashton aren't ever really friends in "NSA" before they hook up. Justin and Mila, on the other hand, have a friendship foundation. Both couples -- SPOILER ALERT! -- end up together (did anybody think they wouldn't?) but in "FWB" it's because the pair actually genuinely liked each other first and then fell in love.
Sunday, August 28, 2011
Turner Classic Challenge
Saturday, August 27, 2011
Book Reviews: "The Wilder Life" and "Case Histories"
"The Wilder Life" by Wendy McClure is the author's non-fiction journey into the world of Laura Ingalls Wilder and the Little House series.
Seriously? Why didn't I think of this??
McClure, like me, grew up reading and loving the Little House books and, as an adult, decided to submerge herself in "Laura World" to learn as much as she could about the real Ingalls family by visiting the places they really lived, cooking the food they really ate, doing the chores they really did and reading practically every written word about them that exists.
Being the huge geek I am, I'd looked up some info on Laura (there's a previous post about her in here somewhere) and the others, so some of what McClure discovered wasn't shocking to me. Other things were, such as Pa knowingly -- and illegally! -- settling on Indian land in Kansas, and that the family lived in and helped run a hotel in Iowa (never mentioned in the books) and skipped town in the middle of the night to avoid paying up on a debt.
Other things helped some puzzle pieces find their place. I'd always thought Pa was sort of irresponsible in the books, hauling his family all over the place and having them endure such a hard life, being brand-new settlers almost everywhere they went. Laura wrote it off as his adventurous spirit, but in reality it seems like the man was an opportunist. I'd also always wondered about Ma, who never seemed as warm as Laura wanted to make her out to be. I always thought she was never happy being a pioneer woman or a farmer's wife. She'd never say so, of course, but I always felt Ma would have been happier if they'd stayed East, and was therefore bitter.
Then there's the stuff with Almanzo. In the books, Laura seems oblivious to his interest until other people start pointing it out. In reality, I think she was aware and simply not interested until at least a year into their acquaintance. Also, Almanzo's age is sort of ambiguous in the story, so we think he's a couple of years older than Laura at the most. In reality he was 10 years older than she, and it's just creepy to think of a 25-year-old man pursuing a 15-year-old girl, so I can't say I blame Laura for writing around that age difference.
McClure seems to have a hard time reconciling the feeling she got while reading the books with the feelings she has in the world of the real people. I'd like to go to a couple of these places myself and see what feelings I have. The important conclusion that McClure comes to, which is one I came to while doing my own research, is that the books are inspired by real people and not necessarily autobiographical. However, since Laura was the author (and would this even have been an issue if she wrote under a pen name?) and it was her own life that inspired the story, they are as credible and genuine in spirit as they ever were, regardless of whether or not the events are true.
"Case Histories" by Kate Atkinson is a mystery novel that was recommended to me by Dianna. Private investigator Jackson Brodie is challenged with working the unsolved murder of an 18-year-old woman (crime happened 10 years previous), the unsolved disappearance of a 3-year-old girl (she vanished 34 years previous) and discovering the whereabouts of a woman who ran away from home as a teenager and would be in her mid-twenties today.
We jump from Brodie's point of view to the characters surrounding each case (mainly the characters who come to Brodie for help), but in the end we see what actually happened to the three subjects.
The truth about the case of the missing toddler wasn't shocking to me, since the guilty party was built up to be suspicious all along. The details of the other characters surrounding the events are what make the mystery rich, and there is certainly more than one person at fault for the course of events.
The truth about the teenage woman's murder is a little random. Several characters around that case are built up to be possible suspects, but in the end it's someone we don't even know who is to blame. That felt a bit like a letdown.
The third case is the most complex, since it involves stolen identities and the least amount of information. I am happy to say I figured out the true identity of the runaway before it was revealed, but the truth about the events that led to the girl's circumstances was a surprise.
All of these characters cross each other's paths in some way, but never in a way that felt forced or unrealistic. I also really enjoyed the writing itself. With the grisly material of the unsolved crimes it was nice to have moments of humor and sarcasm in the mix.
Speaking of the crimes: They were all against girls and/or young women. And the male characters whose thoughts and points of view we saw were very protective of females and always saw the potential danger they were in. The whole thing is like a giant warning note from Atkinson to young women: Beware! You are never safe! There are parts of the book that are unpleasant, but I think that underlying message is what gives the story its true sense of unease.
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
Vacation photos
The view from our balcony.
The bar. =)
Shots! Shots! Shots! Everybody!
Sand castles in the sand. (Robin Sparkles. Get it? Anybody? Bueller?)
The casa.
Texas Forever!!
Thar be pirates aboard, matey!
Sea shells at the sea shore.
Mandalas. The two at the bottom are mine.
"Mine? Mine?" (Finding Nemo. Get it? Anybody? Bueller?)
The casa from the boardwalk.
Margarita night! Everybody!
Until next year...
Saturday, August 6, 2011
Movie Review: "Crazy, Stupid, Love."
Finally! A romantic comedy that works!
The movie follows Cal (Steve Carell) after his wife Emily (Julianne Moore) announces that she wants a divorce. Cal doesn't put up a fight; he just leaves. Spending most nights in a trendy bar, he meets Jacob (Ryan Gosling -- hello!), who is a modern day dandy, for lack of a better term. In the entire movie, the only time we see a woman turn down Jacob's nightly offer of "let's get out of here" is when Hanna (Emma Stone) does it. So, Jacob has game. Cal wants game. Jacob decides to help Cal get game.
One makeover and lots of alcohol later, Cal has had luck with a few women from the bar and found his swagger. The problem is, it's not making him happy. He misses his wife. He wants his old life back (but he seems to like the new clothes, which is a plus) so much so that he sneaks to his old house in the middle of the night to take care of the lawn.
Things get dodgy when one of the women Cal has slept with turns out to be his 13-year-old son's English teacher. This gets revealed publicly, which is awful. Still, it's clear that Cal and Emily care for each other. Otherwise it wouldn't hurt so bad, right?
Things get romantic when Hannah comes out of the blue to accept Jacob's offer after her boyfriend says he's not sure how seriously he feels about her. Instead of jumping right in the sack like she wants, Hannah and Jacob spend the evening getting to know each other and Jacob admits that he's completely unhappy with his life.
After a few weeks of being MIA, Jacob calls Cal to say he's met a girl who's a "game-changer." Hannah takes Jacob to meet her family. Guess who her family is? That's right, Cal and Emily.
There's a whole sub-story with the 13-year-old son, Robbie, having an epic crush on his babysitter and the babysitter having an epic crush on Cal. That business was my only gripe about this movie -- even though those scenarios produced the most comedy, I didn't care.
The reason this movie works is because it doesn't portray love as this perfect thing. It's messy, and backwards, and hopeless, and sometimes awful. But it's also exciting, and beautiful, and hopeful, and sometimes awesome. It's complicated and yet so clear at the same time. It's hard work and taking a risk. It'll make you crazy and stupid, but in the end you'll see it's probably worth it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)